Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 284%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 337%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics255% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive324% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E12
MotherboardMSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 27 '24 at 04:52
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D-$449
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.4 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 78.7
1-Core 204
2-Core 406
118% 230 Pts
4-Core 806
8-Core 1,583
141% 1,195 Pts
64-Core 2,740
170% 2,740 Pts
Poor: 103%
This bench: 115%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-Ti-$749
Gigabyte(1458 40C9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3150 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
255% Outstanding
Lighting 377
Reflection 360
Parallax 382
307% 373 fps
MRender 495
Gravity 312
Splatting 223
267% 343 fps
Poor: 208%
This bench: 255%
Great: 256%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Evo M.2 1TB-$80
821GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0B2QKXJ7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3141 3132 480 391 381 328 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 2634
Write 3,206
Mixed 2,355
SusWrite 1,309
535% 2,376 MB/s
4K Read 61
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 85.5
294% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 1,422
DQ Write 718
DQ Mixed 1,016
769% 1,052 MB/s
Poor: 216%
This bench: 324%
Great: 393%
WDC WD161KRYZ-01AGBB0 16TB
12TB free
Firmware: 01.01H01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 249 245 247 250 250 249 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Read 248
Write 258
Mixed 149
SusWrite 248
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 0.5
18% 7.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 5.7
DQ Mixed 4.3
3% 3.7 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 35%
External USB3.0 DISK04 16TB
659GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 9.9 9.9 9.8 9.8 9.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 50
Write 37.7
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 9.8
40% 32.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 1.7
309% 4.33 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 122%
External USB3.0 DISK02 16TB
708GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 9.9 9.8 9.9 9.8 9.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 50.2
Write 37.7
Mixed 31.8
SusWrite 9.8
40% 32.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 2
325% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 112%
External USB3.0 DISK01 16TB
620GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 9.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 50.1
Write 37.6
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 9.8
40% 32.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 1.8
308% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 93%
External USB3.0 DISK00 16TB
6.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 9.8 9.9 9.9 9.8 9.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 50
Write 37.6
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 9.8
40% 32 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 1.9
318% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
284% Outstanding
MC Read 226
MC Write 49.8
MC Mixed 65.3
325% 114 GB/s
SC Read 44
SC Write 58.6
SC Mixed 48.8
144% 50.5 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 284%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 30 36.1" 1280 720 TCL0000 50S421
Typical MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12) Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 413%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 419%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $2,325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $118
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback