Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 82Y5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive289% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82Y5  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 25 '24 at 20:21
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 780M Graphics
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 43.4
1-Core 132
2-Core 220
69% 132 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 725
68% 567 Pts
64-Core 1,296
80% 1,296 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Legend(17AA 3CAE) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.05.24
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Lighting 65.2
Reflection 27.3
Parallax 97.2
53% 63.2 fps
MRender 31.2
Gravity 82.2
Splatting 100
62% 71.2 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS001TEJ9X115N 1TB
904GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51020A12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1727 1859 1870 1821 1824 1852 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
289% Outstanding
Read 2,442
Write 1,740
Mixed 1,684
SusWrite 1,825
431% 1,923 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 87
4K Mixed 59.2
191% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 547
DQ Write 373
DQ Mixed 594
407% 505 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 289%
Great: 549%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron MT62F1G32D2DS-026 WT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 6400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 45.1
112% 39.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 24.1
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 85%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 120 14.5" 1280 720 SDC4188
Typical 82Y5 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

System: Lenovo 82Y5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback