Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-TRX50 AERO D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-TRX50 AERO D  (all builds)
Memory105.9 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231124
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 11 '24 at 10:02
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX 24-Cores
SP6, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 70.8
1-Core 197
2-Core 408
114% 225 Pts
4-Core 748
8-Core 1,461
131% 1,104 Pts
64-Core 5,352
331% 5,352 Pts
Poor: 106%
This bench: 106%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
EVGA(3842 2382) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
157% Outstanding
Lighting 214
Reflection 212
Parallax 233
175% 220 fps
MRender 248
Gravity 216
Splatting 162
166% 209 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 157%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB-$146
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620331WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,168
Write 4,127
Mixed 3,168
852% 3,821 MB/s
4K Read 61.1
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 79
253% 84.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1950
DQ Write 1487
DQ Mixed 1,682
1,268% 1,706 MB/s
Poor: 293% Great: 666%
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
826GB free
Firmware: RKT401.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,253
Write 3,529
Mixed 2295
606% 2,692 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 73.5
234% 85.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,659
DQ Write 1,241
DQ Mixed 1,464
1,090% 1,455 MB/s
Poor: 189% Great: 486%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
49GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 496
Write 496
Mixed 382
102% 458 MB/s
4K Read 44
4K Write 96.8
4K Mixed 58.7
193% 66.5 MB/s
DQ Read 397
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 374
281% 376 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
12GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,420
Write 2326
Mixed 1,641
474% 2,129 MB/s
4K Read 61.1
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 80.1
263% 89.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,753
DQ Write 1,380
DQ Mixed 1,513
1,147% 1549 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
178GB free
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,612
Write 2,275
Mixed 1,823
497% 2,237 MB/s
4K Read 57.2
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 75.6
252% 87.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,266
DQ Write 532
DQ Mixed 444
449% 747 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
310GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 501
Write 494
Mixed 430
106% 475 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 57.1
188% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 399
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 374
282% 377 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Toshiba HDWF180 8TB
790GB free
Firmware: GX0B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 136
Write 137
Mixed 73
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 0.5
222% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 133%
Toshiba HDWF180 8TB
833GB free
Firmware: GX0B
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 129
Write 141
96% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
219% 1 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 133%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
598GB free
Firmware: 1707
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 49.1
Write 66.6
Mixed 64.3
45% 60 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.5
158% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG84MEBRA174N 4x31.8GB
4 of 8 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
352% Outstanding
MC Read 198
MC Write 103
MC Mixed 127
408% 143 GB/s
SC Read 40.9
SC Write 72.8
SC Mixed 55.8
161% 56.5 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 32" 1280 720 BNQ8020 BenQ LCD
Typical GA-TRX50 AERO D Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 394%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 702%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-TRX50 AERO D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $1,802
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback