Gigabyte GA-Z790 AORUS ELITE X AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics75.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive381% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z790 AORUS ELITE X AX  (all builds)
Memory83.6 GB free of 96 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231214
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 15 '24 at 22:29
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700KF-$285
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 66
1-Core 222
2-Core 438
122% 242 Pts
4-Core 877
8-Core 1,747
155% 1,312 Pts
64-Core 3,107
192% 3,107 Pts
Poor: 121%
This bench: 115%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$220
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Lighting 102
Reflection 86.6
Parallax 93.5
83% 94 fps
MRender 85.5
Gravity 75.8
Splatting 68.2
62% 76.5 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
946GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2777 1771 1755 1759 1781 1764 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
381% Outstanding
Read 2,737
Write 3,393
Mixed 3,068
SusWrite 1,934
629% 2,783 MB/s
4K Read 78.5
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 112
361% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 1,031
DQ Write 765
DQ Mixed 910
677% 902 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 381%
Great: 508%
Samsung 870 EVO 2TB-$181
632GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 485 485 485 485 485 485 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 484
Mixed 455
SusWrite 485
109% 484 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 52.5
170% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 341
256% 343 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 119%
Great: 136%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$81
138GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 119 118 119 119 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 94.5
Write 68
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 119
56% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
349% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 110%
QNAP TR-002 DISK00 8TB
3TB free, PID 0012
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 182 185 185 184 181 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
92.3% Outstanding
Read 187
Write 200
Mixed 220
SusWrite 183
274% 198 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 1
340% 10.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 92.3%
Great: 92%
QNAP TR-002 DISK01 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 0012
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 183 186 186 185 182 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.4% Very good
Read 205
Write 187
Mixed 99.7
SusWrite 184
223% 169 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CP16G56C46U5.C8D CP32G56C46U5.M16D1 CP16G56C46U5.C8D CP32G56C46U5.M16D1 95GB
5600, 5600, 5600, 5600 MHz
16384, 32767, 16384, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
136% Outstanding
MC Read 53.7
MC Write 53.7
MC Mixed 49.8
150% 52.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 46.9
SC Mixed 27.7
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 136%
This bench: 136%
Great: 172%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 55 60 31.5" 1280 720 GSM5B96 LG HDR QHD
Typical GA-Z790 AORUS ELITE X AX Builds (Compare 135 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 456%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 126%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 579%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z790 AORUS ELITE X AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $2,151
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback