Apple MacBookPro16,4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive18.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemApple MacBookPro16,4  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-A61BADE1FDAD7B05
Memory58.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3072 x 1920 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240417
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '24 at 16:19
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9980HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 73.5
2-Core 146
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 577
51% 435 Pts
64-Core 790
49% 790 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
Apple(106B 021E) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.21030.1003
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.9% Above average
Lighting 63.6
Reflection 74.4
Parallax 105
52% 81.1 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 77.4
Splatting 52.4
52% 64.9 fps
Poor: 50%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple APPLE SSD AP4096 4TB
651GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 130
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 149 207 134 125 136 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.6% Very poor
Read 183
Write 222
Mixed 188
SusWrite 146
42% 185 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 7.1
4K Mixed 1.4
8% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAB4GS6ABR8N-VK 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
78.7% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 26.1
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 26
SC Mixed 19.1
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 52 60 16" 1280 720 APPA044 Color LCD
Typical MacBookPro16,4 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

System: Apple MacBookPro16,4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback