Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (55%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X79  (all builds)
Memory39.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20121102
Uptime8 Days
Run DateJan 20 '16 at 17:43
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU 55%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$195
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 112
2-Core 221
81% 142 Pts
4-Core 413
8-Core 630
65% 521 Pts
64-Core 827
51% 827 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX Titan-$1,088
Asus(1043 8451) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5891
Relative performance (0th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Lighting 58.5
Reflection 56.2
Parallax 78.8
48% 64.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 450 512GB-$200
251GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.17 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 62% Great: 104%
Hitachi HDS72404 4TB
663GB free
Firmware: A3B0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 99.3
Write 89.2
Mixed 85.9
69% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.92
4K Write 1.94
4K Mixed 0.23
100% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Vulcan-1600 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 38.2
MC Mixed 34.7
106% 37.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14
43% 15.1 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,815 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $727
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback