Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 83E1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 83E1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory6.1 GB free of 16 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240402
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 23 '24 at 17:40
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Z1 Extreme
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Memory 54.3
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 173
58% 106 Pts
4-Core 294
8-Core 556
51% 425 Pts
64-Core 877
54% 877 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M
Legend(17AA 3812) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.20.24.03
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.3% Very poor
Lighting 19.7
Reflection 25.1
Parallax 31.1
16% 25.3 fps
MRender 25.5
Gravity 23.2
Splatting 41
26% 29.9 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDPMQD-512G-1101 512GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73116001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,884
Write 2,656
Mixed 2,268
580% 2,603 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 42.3
144% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 880
DQ Write 644
DQ Mixed 767
572% 764 MB/s
Poor: 133% Great: 425%
Kingston DataTraveler 70 124GB
30GB free, PID 172b
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 5
Write 2.7
Mixed 4.5
5% 4.07 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.05 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H58G66BK7HX096 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h clocked @ 7500 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 34.3
95% 33.4 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 26.1
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 87%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 30 42.5" 1280 720 AUS43E1 ASUS XG438
Typical 83E1 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Lenovo 83E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback