Today's hottest deals

Asus 1215N

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive23.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus 1215N  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK 1215N
Memory2.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '16 at 21:14
Run Duration330 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom D525-$250
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 10.5
2-Core 19.2
25% 30.2 Pts
4-Core 34.5
8-Core 34
5% 34.2 Pts
64-Core 32.9
2% 32.9 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95
177GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.7% Poor
Read 223
Write 90.5
Mixed 124
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 7.93
4K Write 5.37
4K Mixed 3.59
19% 5.63 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 52
DQ Mixed 27.5
34% 62.8 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 83%
Kingston DataTraveler Ultimate USB 3.0 64GB
4GB free, PID 1656
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 39.8
Write 21.4
Mixed 16.7
29% 26 MB/s
4K Read 3.35
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.006
13% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 38%
Multiple Card Reader 8GB
4GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
7.39% Terrible
Read 18.9
Write 9.13
Mixed 9.33
14% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.32
4K Write 0.54
4K Mixed 0.47
50% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.39%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
15.2% Very poor
MC Read 5.4
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 4.5
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.8
SC Write 5
SC Mixed 5
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1215N Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus 1215N

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 24% - Poor Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback