Lenovo 10117

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10117  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131226
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 12 '18 at 18:41
Run Duration99 Seconds
Run User GEO-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-5500 APU-$135
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
43.8% Average
Memory 61.7
1-Core 56.4
2-Core 113
46% 77 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 161
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-Ti-$362
Gigabyte(1458 3552) 2GB
CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Lighting 34.7
Reflection 34.9
Parallax 43.1
28% 37.5 fps
MRender 41.3
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 30.2
30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 23%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 29%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 583ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 456
Write 112
Mixed 154
52% 241 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 11
90% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 25.9
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 28.3
35% 57.7 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.M8F Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
29.4% Poor
MC Read 14.4
MC Write 5.9
MC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 9.1
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10117 Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10117

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback