Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B760 GAMING X AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 241%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 270%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 117%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics212% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B760 GAMING X AX  (all builds)
Memory118.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230606
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 06 '24 at 11:48
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700KF-$290
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Memory 68.9
1-Core 215
2-Core 437
121% 241 Pts
4-Core 880
8-Core 1,521
145% 1,200 Pts
64-Core 2,452
152% 2,452 Pts
Poor: 121%
This bench: 117%
Great: 131%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080 12GB
MSI(1462 389B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 552.12
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Lighting 312
Reflection 275
Parallax 320
255% 302 fps
MRender 355
Gravity 255
Splatting 187
208% 266 fps
Poor: 143%
This bench: 212%
Great: 211%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$199
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1610 1611 1467 1221 1170 1028 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 1,528
Write 1,755
Mixed 1,129
SusWrite 1,351
325% 1,441 MB/s
4K Read 65.5
4K Write 228
4K Mixed 95
342% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 904
DQ Write 926
DQ Mixed 323
406% 718 MB/s
Poor: 154%
This bench: 290%
Great: 282%
JAJP600M4TB 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: VC2S038F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1330 1429 1429 1426 1420 1421 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
282% Outstanding
Read 1,736
Write 934
Mixed 1,294
SusWrite 1,409
301% 1,343 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 77.2
280% 107 MB/s
DQ Read 790
DQ Write 1,030
DQ Mixed 932
697% 917 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 282%
Great: 282%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
917GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 78 78 77 78 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Read 174
Write 90.9
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 77.1
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX5M2B5200C40 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
130% Outstanding
MC Read 50.2
MC Write 51.2
MC Mixed 48.1
142% 49.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 45.6
SC Mixed 27.4
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 130%
Great: 174%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 53: 0P 4R 8G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 8% 73 213 54 60 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27B2
History: Score 8: 0P 0R 1G 5B | Score 53: 0P 4R 8G 9B
Typical GA-B760 GAMING X AX Builds (Compare 886 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 226%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 249%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B760 GAMING X AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 122% - Outstanding Total price: $815
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback