Today's hottest deals

QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive91.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240215
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 05 '24 at 07:09
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ABW-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
13th Gen Intel Core i5-13600K
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 65.6
1-Core 166
2-Core 335
98% 189 Pts
4-Core 637
8-Core 646
86% 642 Pts
64-Core 646
40% 646 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700
XFX(1EAE 661A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 10GB, Driver: 24.1.1
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
109% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 137
Parallax 227
94% 160 fps
MRender 217
Gravity 122
Splatting 197
147% 178 fps
Poor: 106%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 1TB
630GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 343 370 371 373 376 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Read 434
Write 401
Mixed 250
SusWrite 364
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 35.9
120% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 180
173% 274 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB DIMM RAM
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
61.3% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 21.1
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 19
52% 18.3 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 145%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 30 84.6" 1280 720 SAM7016 SAMSUNG
Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback