HP EliteBook 645 14 inch G10 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP EliteBook 645 14 inch G10 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B5F
Memory6.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 23 '24 at 07:47
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 7330U Graphics
FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
63.1% Good
Memory 47.4
1-Core 148
2-Core 283
81% 159 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 559
63% 496 Pts
64-Core 516
32% 516 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8B5F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.10.18.09
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 13
Reflection 9.5
Parallax 20.8
11% 14.4 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 16.8
Splatting 17.8
12% 13.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50znv256g KIOXIA 256GB
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP02AN00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 904 495 394 396 400 394 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,377
Write 1,232
Mixed 973
SusWrite 497
228% 1,020 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 42
136% 44.4 MB/s
DQ Read 561
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 295
244% 359 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 145%
Great: 240%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G43CB2-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.6% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 9.9
33% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 9.8
28% 9.77 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 2: 0P 0R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
2% 4% 56 92 57 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN145C
Typical EliteBook 645 14 inch G10 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 645 14 inch G10 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback