Today's hottest deals

MSI Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7978
MotherboardMSI Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978)  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '24 at 18:07
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 86
1-Core 131
2-Core 242
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 661
67% 545 Pts
64-Core 663
41% 663 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$449
Asus(1043 8548) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1582 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
84% Excellent
Lighting 105
Reflection 119
Parallax 106
86% 110 fps
MRender 102
Gravity 103
Splatting 93.5
81% 99.4 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria G2 SSD 1TB
122GB free
Firmware: ECFA17.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1137 692 689 690 615 594 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1,251
Write 1,656
Mixed 1,351
SusWrite 736
282% 1,249 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 41.1
129% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 310
226% 297 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 148%
Great: 251%
Crucial BX100 500GB-$49
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 255 156 198 158 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 485
Write 432
Mixed 339
SusWrite 208
82% 366 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 53.8
4K Mixed 32.1
105% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 208
172% 247 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 108%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
139GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 205 82 81 82 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
79.1% Very good
Read 491
Write 462
Mixed 409
SusWrite 164
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 36.1
118% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 280
210% 280 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 121%
Samsung PSSD T7 Shield 2TB
972GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 587 569 593 591 513 572 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 456
Write 602
Mixed 504
SusWrite 571
121% 533 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 36.9
4K Mixed 26.6
86% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 214
160% 214 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 89%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
224GB free
Firmware: AX002F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 78 78 78 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 85.9
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 77.7
54% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 57%
Toshiba MK3261GSYN 320GB-$72
157GB free
Firmware: MH000C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 61 60 61 60 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
34% Below average
Read 58.2
Write 41.4
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 59.9
34% 46.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 34%
Great: 64%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
201GB free, PID a100
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 113 112 112 112 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 87.4
Write 88.3
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 112
109% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
69.5% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 22
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 22.4
63% 22 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 29 7 120 72.3" 1280 720 GSM81CD LG TV SSCR2
Typical Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978) Builds (Compare 2,428 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI Z170A GAMING M3 (MS-7978) - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $534
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback