Asrock B150M Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 17% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock B150M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151109
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Jan 11 '18 at 08:53
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 75.1 1-Core 103 2-Core 193 70% 124 Pts	4-Core 353 8-Core 558 56% 455 Pts	64-Core 589 36% 589 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Nvidia(10DE 105F) 1GB CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.59 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Lighting 25.1 Reflection 18.8 Parallax 22.1 20% 22 fps	MRender 26 Gravity 25.7 Splatting 18.8 19% 23.5 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 117GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 473 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 173 (B1) Unknown 99 99 2 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 52 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 28 (F1) Unknown 99 99 1606334509	60.5% Good	Read 495 Write 296 Mixed 289 79% 360 MB/s	4K Read 17.6 4K Write 45.6 4K Mixed 11.5 66% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 22.1 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 10.9 28% 55.7 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 60.5% Great: 124%
SanDisk Z400s 128GB-$109 10,807 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 53GB free Firmware: Z2320000 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 16 100 16 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 248 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 7 (A9) Unknown 100 100 238 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 5 (AE) Unknown 100 100 69 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 57 100 223338299435 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 14 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 20 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 493 (F1) Unknown 253 253 420 (F2) Unknown 253 253 591	61.4% Good	Read 500 Write 177 Mixed 261 68% 313 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 76.4 4K Mixed 4.04 80% 34.3 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 24.8 66% 141 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 61.4% Great: 71%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 120 99 240043824 (03) Spinup time 98 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1732 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 67 60 5898712 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 2890 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 396 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 58 387252247 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 13 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 90 90 20930 (C2) HDA temperature 23 42 17179869207 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 17274358465307 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2046803916 (F2) Unknown 100 253 14333898023	94.4% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 150 Mixed 145 119% 158 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.17 4K Mixed 0.13 57% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 94.4% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB M378A1K43CB2-CRC 16GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 13.5 MC Mixed 10.9 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 11.9 SC Mixed 9.8 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 90.2 44% 90.2 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B150M Pro4 Builds (Compare 373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock B150M Pro4

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	84x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	69x
Core i5-6600Intel $132Bench 68%, 80,688 samples	52x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	51x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	20x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	20x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	12x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	11x

RAM
M378A1G43EB1-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 3,609 samples	13x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	10x
M378A1G43EB1-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 3,078 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $283

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16