Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-HD3P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.31% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-F2A88XM-HD3P  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 29 '24 at 18:12
Run Duration297 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-5400K APU-$120
P0, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Memory 55.8
1-Core 40.8
2-Core 49.4
33% 48.7 Pts
4-Core 79.2
8-Core 79.1
11% 79.1 Pts
64-Core 78.3
5% 78.3 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.31% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 4.2
Parallax 4.2
3% 4.1 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 4
Splatting 5
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.31%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team L5 LITE SSD 240GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0803B5
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 406
Write 340
Mixed 148
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 34.3
4K Mixed 31.5
96% 30.1 MB/s
DQ Read 188
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 90.7
87% 137 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 104%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
266GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 115
Write 104
Mixed 22.2
58% 80.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 103%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$25
714GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,234
Write 16.7
Mixed 45.1
310% 432 MB/s
4K Read 202
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 3.4
8,820% 68.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 87%
VendorCo ProductCode 32GB
29GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 22.8
Write 12.7
Mixed 5
14% 13.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.4
48% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
13GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 16.6
Write 13.2
Mixed 7.5
15% 12.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
29% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 9%
UDISK PDU01-4G 8AH2.0 4GB
4GB free, PID 0165
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 18.9
Write 3.2
Mixed 4.7
8% 8.93 MB/s
4K Read 5.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
24% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 1% Great: 5%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
1GB free, PID 0302
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 15.7
Write 11.4
Mixed 6.7
13% 11.3 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
32% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 9%
WDC WD32 00BEVT-22ZCT0 320GB
44GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 20 20 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 52.5
Write 24
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 19.7
34% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
42% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/ 99U5584-005.A 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
19.7% Very poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.43 GB/s
SC Read 7.1
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 0 0 60 22" 1280 720 DELF010 DELL 2209WA
Typical GA-F2A88XM-HD3P Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A88XM-HD3P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback