Acer Predator PO3-600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics88.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PO3-600  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator PO3-600(DCH)
Memory4.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200408
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '24 at 17:38
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 91
1-Core 120
2-Core 239
85% 150 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 609
70% 543 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$269
Sapphire(174B A520) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.7% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 101
Parallax 106
91% 106 fps
MRender 136
Gravity 95.1
Splatting 87.6
85% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ256HAJD-00000 256GB
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXV7000Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 108 113 109 109 113 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 962
Write 148
Mixed 182
SusWrite 112
75% 351 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 36
147% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 160
125% 175 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 169%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
675GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8K0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 159 165 164 163 162 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 163
Write 165
Mixed 49
SusWrite 162
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 107%
VendorCo ProductCode 126GB
112GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 3.5 5.9 7.3 6.9 3.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
5.52% Terrible
Read 21
Write 1.3
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 5.3
7% 7.35 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.2
25% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.52%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.6% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 30.2
MC Mixed 24.2
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 15.8
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 0P 2R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 17% 35 214 57 60 24" 1280 720 LHC2360 ITMC24V161FHD
Typical Predator PO3-600 Builds (Compare 2,676 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

System: Acer Predator PO3-600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $506
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback