MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7E12
MotherboardMSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)  (all builds)
Memory76.4 GB free of 96 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230811
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '24 at 12:27
Run Duration405 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$486
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 76.1
1-Core 197
2-Core 391
114% 221 Pts
4-Core 777
8-Core 1,526
136% 1,152 Pts
64-Core 3,560
220% 3,560 Pts
Poor: 103%
This bench: 111%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
111% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 170
Parallax 187
108% 163 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 146
Splatting 123
122% 154 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 111%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 960 4TB
76GB free
Firmware: A200V9QF
SusWrite @10s intervals: 454 173 167 245 203 174 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 607
Write 1,529
Mixed 1174
SusWrite 236
202% 886 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 28.5
150% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 647
DQ Write 737
DQ Mixed 606
480% 663 MB/s
Poor: 263%
This bench: 114%
Great: 633%
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$140
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 384 666 333 518 621 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 385
Write 1,809
Mixed 540
SusWrite 464
183% 799 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 33.3
161% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 730
DQ Write 459
DQ Mixed 547
421% 579 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 118%
Great: 303%
WDC WD40PURZ-85TTDY0 4TB
177GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 577 897 664 996 652 700 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$34
927GB free
Firmware: AX101U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 453 173 167 245 203 174 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
54GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 428 322 295 389 364 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 101%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB
1TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 429 322 296 389 364 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 27% Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-5600J4040D48G 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
159% Outstanding
MC Read 60.3
MC Write 56.9
MC Mixed 56.2
165% 57.8 GB/s
SC Read 51.2
SC Write 61.5
SC Mixed 49
154% 53.9 GB/s
Latency 92
44% 92 ns
Poor: 159%
This bench: 159%
Great: 260%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 33 4 144 27" 2560 1369 ACR06CF VG270U P
Typical MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12) Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 414%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 422%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG X670E TOMAHAWK WIFI (MS-7E12)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $2,090
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback