Asus PRIME A320M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive259% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-A  (all builds)
Memory24.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230904
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '24 at 00:27
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 74
1-Core 102
2-Core 210
72% 129 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 609
61% 494 Pts
64-Core 1,110
69% 1,110 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.3% Average
Lighting 53
Reflection 59.4
Parallax 73.3
43% 61.9 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 59.3
Splatting 43.8
43% 54.4 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 47%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDHL1TB-D8 1TB
828GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0414A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1503 1257 1476 1517 1462 1329 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 2,212
Write 1,535
Mixed 1,249
SusWrite 1,424
358% 1,605 MB/s
4K Read 48.7
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 34.5
177% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 816
DQ Write 603
DQ Mixed 579
468% 666 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 259%
Great: 248%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Avant W644GU44J2320NH 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48% Average
MC Read 18.2
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 15.2
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 18.1
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 90
44% 90 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 8: 0P 1R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
8% 12% 17 206 55 75 23.8" 1280 720 SPT09A8 Sceptre F24
Typical PRIME A320M-A Builds (Compare 550 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $269
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback