Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics99.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive81% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST X99-MR9A PRO
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '24 at 12:15
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2660 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
65% Good
Memory 77.2
1-Core 76.1
2-Core 160
61% 105 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 601
52% 443 Pts
64-Core 1,361
84% 1,361 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
MSI(1462 C757) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.23
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.6% Outstanding
Lighting 119
Reflection 109
Parallax 123
97% 117 fps
MRender 179
Gravity 115
Splatting 103
105% 132 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
NT-256 256GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 390 387 389 397 399 404 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 456
Write 376
Mixed 328
SusWrite 394
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 64.4
4K Mixed 22.3
100% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 83.7
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 36.5
75% 144 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 81%
Great: 100%
Netac OnlyDisk 248GB
49GB free, PID 3b00
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
9.44% Terrible
Read 54.6
Write 36
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 0.7
36% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.5
36% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.44%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.1% Good
MC Read 31
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 21.5
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 14.1
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 60 21.5" 1280 720 CHE0001 AIO LCD
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback