Fujitsu CELSIUS W580

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	42.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 months ago, 3 months ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS W580 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3617-A1
Memory	10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220210
Uptime	23.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 05 '24 at 16:45
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9600 931 User benchmarks, average bench 92% CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	91.5% Outstanding	Memory 90.8 1-Core 132 2-Core 263 90% 162 Pts	4-Core 502 8-Core 684 75% 594 Pts	64-Core 687 42% 687 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 91.5% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Nvidia(10DE 1320) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.99 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42.3% Average	Lighting 55.1 Reflection 56.6 Parallax 48.5 45% 53.4 fps	MRender 41.3 Gravity 49.2 Splatting 45.8 37% 45.4 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-512G-1016 512GB 197 User benchmarks, average bench 221% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: 10200016 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,620 Write 1,641 Mixed 1,472 353% 1,578 MB/s	4K Read 33.6 4K Write 89 4K Mixed 49.9 162% 57.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1,166 DQ Write 865 DQ Mixed 978 741% 1,003 MB/s
Poor: 154% Great: 261%
SAMSUNG HM320JI 320GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 36GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 32 32 32 32 32 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	16.8% Very poor	Read 53.8 Write 30.2 Mixed 23.9 SusWrite 31.8 43% 34.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.5 41% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 16.8% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB 29,586 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	83.5% Excellent	MC Read 33.2 MC Write 32.1 MC Mixed 25.1 86% 30.1 GB/s	SC Read 15.8 SC Write 31.3 SC Mixed 22.5 66% 23.2 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 83.5% Great: 96%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	59	100	48.8"	1280 720	SAM0F9C C49RG9x

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS W580 Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 48%

Yacht

Desktop 93%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 41%

Speed boat

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W580

CPU
Core i5-8600Intel $190Bench 88%, 18,241 samples	5x
Xeon E-2124IntelBench 84%, 385 samples	4x
Core i5-9500IntelBench 87%, 9,059 samples	4x

GPU
Quadro P2200NvidiaBench 47%, 5,007 samples	6x
Quadro P400NvidiaBench 9%, 5,817 samples	6x
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 41%, 13,958 samples	5x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-00007 512GBSamsungBench 236%, 335 samples	5x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	5x
PC SN720 SDAPNTW-256G-1016 256GBWDCBench 173%, 227 samples	4x

RAM
M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 80%, 29,586 samples	15x
16ATF2G64AZ-2G6E1 2x16GBMicronBench 82%, 771 samples	3x
M378A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,582 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $190

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16