Asus Z97-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z97-A  (all builds)
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151111
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 09 '18 at 17:06
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 92.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 222
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 436
57% 430 Pts
64-Core 441
27% 441 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 367B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Lighting 70.4
Reflection 70
Parallax 68.7
57% 69.7 fps
MRender 74.8
Gravity 65.1
Splatting 56.2
52% 65.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 499
Write 404
Mixed 414
98% 439 MB/s
4K Read 33.3
4K Write 75.2
4K Mixed 32.7
132% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 40
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 22.9
32% 56.1 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 115%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78
715GB free
Firmware: MK7OA840 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 147
Write 150
Mixed 98.7
98% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.4
100% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 82%
Dell Recovery USB 8GB
4GB free, PID null
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 108
Write 12.1
Mixed 23.2
43% 47.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.57
4K Write 0.89
4K Mixed 0.72
79% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 0467 RMR5040ED58E9W1600 1315 BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.4% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 16.4
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z97-A Builds (Compare 5,085 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus Z97-A - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $798
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback