Asus ROG STRIX G16CH_G16CH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ROG STRIX G16CH_G16CH  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK G16CH
Memory47.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230821
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJan 27 '24 at 18:51
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700F-$394
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 82
1-Core 209
2-Core 421
122% 237 Pts
4-Core 831
8-Core 1,545
142% 1188 Pts
64-Core 2,732
169% 2,732 Pts
Poor: 116%
This bench: 119%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$250
Asus(1043 8811) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 134
Reflection 119
Parallax 124
109% 125 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 102
Splatting 88.8
88% 111 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
189GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA003 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1547 1600 1209 339 81 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 1793
Write 1,565
Mixed 1,414
SusWrite 809
313% 1,395 MB/s
4K Read 67.1
4K Write 240
4K Mixed 43.3
284% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 851
DQ Write 1,118
DQ Mixed 804
657% 924 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 247%
Great: 234%
Nvme WD_BLACK SN850X 2000GB
948GB free
Firmware: 620331WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4305 4285 3208 2432 2647 2278 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
548% Outstanding
Read 4,200
Write 4,341
Mixed 3,097
SusWrite 3,192
834% 3,708 MB/s
4K Read 72.3
4K Write 220
4K Mixed 95.6
348% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 2,108
DQ Write 1,401
DQ Mixed 1759
1,311% 1,756 MB/s
Poor: 253%
This bench: 548%
Great: 666%
ROG ESD-S1C 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 402 397 398 395 396 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
77.2% Very good
Read 361
Write 384
Mixed 372
SusWrite 396
86% 378 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 31.3
100% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 146
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 169
125% 164 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
97.5% Outstanding
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 35.9
MC Mixed 34.2
100% 35.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.1
SC Write 39.7
SC Mixed 28.7
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 79.5
50% 79.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 97.5%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 37: 0P 5R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
9% 39% 18 218 59 144 27" 1280 720 AUS2703 ASUS VG279Q1A
History: Score 9: 0P 0R 1G 6B | Score 37: 0P 5R 2G 6B
Typical ROG STRIX G16CH_G16CH Builds (Compare 153 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 183%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 216%
UFO

System: Asus ROG STRIX G16CH_G16CH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $775
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback