Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics97.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardMACHINIST X99-RS9
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220715
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 27 '24 at 05:54
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 74.8
1-Core 83.5
2-Core 163
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 597
53% 449 Pts
64-Core 1,279
79% 1,279 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
Nvidia(10DE 1F06) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.65
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.1% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 106
Parallax 119
95% 114 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 111
Splatting 102
102% 128 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 97.1%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$59
150GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42G2U67A Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 287 290 287 219 268 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 2,093
Write 860
Mixed 555
SusWrite 305
208% 953 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 50.7
161% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 625
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 348
282% 411 MB/s
Poor: 139%
This bench: 173%
Great: 271%
QUMO SPEEDSTER 3.0 32GB
19GB free, PID 5200
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 19 18 21 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.4% Poor
Read 121
Write 56.7
Mixed 14.9
SusWrite 19.1
56% 52.9 MB/s
4K Read 7.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 1.4
74% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 28%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
60% Good
MC Read 27.3
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 19.1
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 16.7
SC Mixed 15.9
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 27" 1280 720 AUS2725 ASUS VG279Q1A
Typical string Builds (Compare 15,490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback