Today's hottest deals

MSI MEG X670E GODLIKE (MS-7D68)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 347%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 457%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics332% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive473% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D68
MotherboardMSI MEG X670E GODLIKE (MS-7D68)  (all builds)
Memory76.7 GB free of 128 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230810
Uptime13.9 Days
Run DateJan 24 '24 at 03:35
Run Duration336 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D-$575
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 68.1
1-Core 203
2-Core 400
114% 224 Pts
4-Core 797
8-Core 1,544
139% 1,170 Pts
64-Core 3,459
214% 3,459 Pts
Poor: 113%
This bench: 109%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.33
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
332% Outstanding
Lighting 486
Reflection 670
Parallax 628
396% 595 fps
MRender 542
Gravity 583
Splatting 313
376% 479 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 332%
Great: 402%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$193
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3272 3225 3252 3282 3282 2504 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
473% Outstanding
Read 2,818
Write 3,305
Mixed 3,018
SusWrite 3,136
694% 3,069 MB/s
4K Read 73.2
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 103
346% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,546
DQ Write 1,201
DQ Mixed 1,350
1,016% 1,366 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 473%
Great: 508%
ST12000NM000J-2TY103 12TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 255 254 252 254 253 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 200
Write 200
Mixed 121
SusWrite 253
44% 194 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 18
4K Mixed 0.2
49% 14.7 MB/s
DQ Read 0
DQ Write 15
DQ Mixed 0.4
2% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 47%
ST12000NM000J-2TY103 12TB
686GB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 246 247 246 247 243 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 231
Write 241
Mixed 117
SusWrite 245
47% 208 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 1
61% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 3.4
DQ Write 15.8
DQ Mixed 0.2
3% 6.47 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 47%
Kingston SNV2S2000G 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1742 1768 1765 1767 1773 1766 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
310% Outstanding
Read 2,073
Write 1,842
Mixed 1,480
SusWrite 1,763
402% 1,790 MB/s
4K Read 50.9
4K Write 171
4K Mixed 47.3
228% 89.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,158
DQ Write 1,163
DQ Mixed 701
653% 1,007 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 310%
Great: 402%
Kingston SNV2S2000G 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SBM02103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1329 1327 1334 1329 1326 1328 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 2,050
Write 1,346
Mixed 1,300
SusWrite 1,329
337% 1,506 MB/s
4K Read 51
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 44.6
210% 79.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,171
DQ Write 998
DQ Mixed 664
612% 944 MB/s
Poor: 176%
This bench: 274%
Great: 402%
Seagate ST12000NM000J 00MX141 00MX141LEN 12TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 159 141 191 190 190 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
104% Outstanding
Read 189
Write 202
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 174
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.3
151% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 104%
This bench: 104%
Great: 105%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-6000J3040G32G 4x31.8GB
4 of 4 slots used
127GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (64th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
161% Outstanding
MC Read 102
MC Write 39.4
MC Mixed 44.9
177% 62 GB/s
SC Read 34.8
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 38.2
111% 38.8 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 116%
This bench: 161%
Great: 213%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 17 120 48.8" 1280 720 SAM71AC LS49AG95
Typical MEG X670E GODLIKE (MS-7D68) Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 417%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 570%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X670E GODLIKE (MS-7D68)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $2,722
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback