Dell Precision Tower 5810

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Speed boat	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 41% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	44.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	75.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Dell Precision Tower 5810
Motherboard	Dell Precision Tower 5810 (all builds)
Memory	25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170726
Uptime	3.2 Days
Run Date	Jan 09 '18 at 06:40
Run Duration	232 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v3 7,962 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	82.2% Excellent	Memory 90 1-Core 107 2-Core 208 78% 135 Pts	4-Core 401 8-Core 647 64% 524 Pts	64-Core 839 52% 839 Pts
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000 13,958 User benchmarks, average bench 41% Dell(1028 11B3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 385.8 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	44.6% Average	Lighting 54.8 Reflection 58.6 Parallax 48.9 45% 54.1 fps	MRender 50.1 Gravity 51.9 Splatting 58.7 44% 53.6 fps
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 44.6% Great: 42%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 66GB free Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 15043 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 221 (B1) Unknown 99 99 17 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 55 25 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 74 (F1) Unknown 99 99 36672711124	102% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 408 Mixed 416 99% 446 MB/s	4K Read 41 4K Write 83.5 4K Mixed 44.2 163% 56.2 MB/s	DQ Read 38.2 DQ Write 260 DQ Mixed 22.3 55% 107 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 62GB free Firmware: 1B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 17754 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 201 (B1) Unknown 99 99 9 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 59 27 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 24 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9532446162	106% Outstanding	Read 520 Write 410 Mixed 419 100% 450 MB/s	4K Read 41.5 4K Write 82.7 4K Mixed 39.1 157% 54.4 MB/s	DQ Read 327 DQ Write 244 DQ Mixed 110 130% 227 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 134%
Samsung SM841N 2.5 7mm 256GB 2,088 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3D0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 219 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 77 77 817 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 9152 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (F1) Unknown 99 99 55597182680 (F2) Unknown 99 99 42689856992	75.8% Very good	Read 512 Write 126 Mixed 236 63% 291 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 83.5 4K Mixed 24.9 122% 46.2 MB/s	DQ Read 334 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 76.2 105% 196 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 108%
BUFFALO HD-QLU3/R5 1 12TB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3.5TB free, PID 01cd Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	13.3% Very poor	Read 36.4 Write 34.9 Mixed 33.1 44% 34.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.06 7% 0.18 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.3% Great: 131%
BUFFALO HD-QLU3/R5 1 6TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1.5TB free, PID 01cd Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Read 139 Write 93.6 Mixed 99.4 134% 111 MB/s	4K Read 4.07 4K Write 0.09 4K Mixed 0.08 21% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 85%
BUFFALO HD-QHU3/R5 1 12TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 286GB free, PID 025f Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	48.7% Average	Read 152 Write 116 Mixed 132 166% 133 MB/s	4K Read 4.29 4K Write 0.12 4K Mixed 0.07 22% 1.49 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 119%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393A1G43DB0-CPB 4x8GB 963 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	MC Read 42.7 MC Write 42.9 MC Mixed 41.5 121% 42.4 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 20.4 SC Mixed 22 55% 19.2 GB/s	Latency 67.2 60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 121%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision Tower 5810 Builds (Compare 5,343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 31%

Sail boat

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 5810

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v3IntelBench 72%, 10,197 samples	1,259x
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples	978x
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples	424x

GPU
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples	424x
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples	395x
Quadro M2000NvidiaBench 21%, 5,678 samples	293x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	109x
SM871 2.5 7mm 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 1,320 samples	109x
MX500 500GBCrucial $48Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	65x

RAM
HMA451R7MFR8N-TF 4x4GBHynixBench 90%, 1,961 samples	359x
HMA41GR7MFR8N-TF 4x8GBHynixBench 96%, 1,319 samples	216x
9ASF1G72PZ-2G3B1 4x8GBMicronBench 93%, 857 samples	196x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $80

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363