Lenovo 20245

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20245  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO INVALID
Memory1.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680x1050x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130719
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJan 08 '18 at 19:59
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium 2020M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
48.4% Average
Memory 86
1-Core 65.2
2-Core 126
58% 92.3 Pts
4-Core 63.2
8-Core 112
11% 87.8 Pts
64-Core 117
7% 117 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3912) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.72% Terrible
Lighting 1.77
Reflection 6.73
Parallax 1.31
1% 3.27 fps
MRender 3.52
Gravity 1.07
Splatting 3.48
2% 2.69 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.72%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 499
Write 119
Mixed 165
56% 261 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 11.5
67% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 119
DQ Mixed 6.53
34% 76.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 75%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB
2TB free, PID 0c15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 37.5
Write 37.7
Mixed 32.1
46% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.44
4K Mixed 0.27
95% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 21%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 64GB
53GB free, PID 0749
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 45.2
Write 19.8
Mixed 38
41% 34.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.78
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 1.16
115% 2.84 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 43%
sobetter Ext. HDD 500GB
43GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 84.8
Write 74.3
Mixed 76.8
100% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 0.74
4K Mixed 0.19
34% 0.48 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 151%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 CT51264BF160BJ.M8F 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.9% Average
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 12.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20245 Builds (Compare 187 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20245

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $70
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback