Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VI_GU604VI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive339% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VI_GU604VI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GU604VI
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '24 at 20:25
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 69.3
1-Core 209
2-Core 416
118% 232 Pts
4-Core 805
8-Core 1,268
128% 1,037 Pts
64-Core 2,209
137% 2,209 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 110%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1473) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4502
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Lighting 19.4
Reflection 26.2
Parallax 24.9
16% 23.5 fps
MRender 22.9
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 1
6% 8.03 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WD PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1002 1TB
216GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 74104000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 309 306 308 304 298 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
339% Outstanding
Read 3,849
Write 2,805
Mixed 2,137
SusWrite 306
504% 2,274 MB/s
4K Read 67.4
4K Write 233
4K Mixed 89.8
340% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 1,447
DQ Write 1,351
DQ Mixed 1,264
986% 1,354 MB/s
Poor: 182%
This bench: 339%
Great: 511%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOL 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
76.2% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 26.9
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 21.5
SC Mixed 20
56% 19.6 GB/s
Latency 97.7
41% 97.7 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 25: 0P 5R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
25% 42% 12 216 57 240 16" 1280 720 TMX1603 TL160ADMP03-0
Typical ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VI_GU604VI Builds (Compare 1,041 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 148%
UFO

System: Asus ROG Zephyrus M16 GU604VI_GU604VI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback