ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP ER908AA-ABA A1477C

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP ER908AA-ABA A1477C (all builds)
Motherboard	MSI AMETHYST-M
Memory	0.8 GB free of 1.75 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060303
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 08 '18 at 15:43
Run Duration	707 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4400+-$50 2,970 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Socket 939, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	41.5% Average	Memory 72.7 1-Core 32.2 2-Core 63.6 39% 56.2 Pts	4-Core 63.3 8-Core 62.6 8% 62.9 Pts	64-Core 63.9 4% 63.9 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 41.5% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI RADEON XPRESS 200 HP(103C 2A24) 64MB Driver: atiumdag Ver. 8.383.0.0 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Lighting 0.1 Reflection 0.27 0% 0.18 fps

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$23 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 447GB free (System drive) Firmware: 12.01C01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 177 174 6125 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5999 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 54 54 33899 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4469 (C0) Power-off retract count 198 198 1945 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6114 (C2) HDA temperature 124 94 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	39.4% Below average	Read 73.7 Write 63.7 Mixed 53.6 48% 63.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.29 4K Write 1.22 4K Mixed 0.25 62% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 69%
Seagate ST3250823AS 250GB-$99 5,049 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 196GB free Firmware: 3.03 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 47 45 52618343 (03) Spinup time 98 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 4014 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 82 60 196244447 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 6275 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 4066 (C2) HDA temperature 27 52 55834574875 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 47 45 52618343 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	34.1% Below average	Read 56.6 Write 62.1 Mixed 15 32% 44.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.35 82% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 37%
OCZ DIESEL 4GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 1f00 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	3.22% Terrible	Read 9.57 Write 3.99 Mixed 5.47 7% 6.35 MB/s	4K Read 3.95 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.01 15% 1.32 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.22% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1GB 4,189 User benchmarks, average bench 13% null MHz 512, 512, 512, 256 MB Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	8.91% Terrible	MC Read 2.3 MC Write 2.1 MC Mixed 2 6% 2.13 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 1.5 SC Mixed 2.1 6% 2 GB/s	Latency 95.3 42% 95.3 ns
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.91% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $369	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback