Today's hottest deals

Asus SABERTOOTH X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics76.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X79  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 11 '24 at 19:21
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1680 v2
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Memory 93.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 231
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 802
76% 628 Pts
64-Core 1,164
72% 1,164 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
EVGA(3842 1667) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 537.58
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.8% Very good
Lighting 96.4
Reflection 95.3
Parallax 87.2
79% 93 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 91.3
Splatting 78.7
74% 91.5 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 85 86 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 346
Write 156
Mixed 200
SusWrite 81.5
43% 196 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 37.7
122% 39 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 157
120% 165 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 134%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 85 86 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65% Good
Read 352
Write 154
Mixed 212
SusWrite 81.6
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 37.6
123% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 156
120% 165 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 65%
Great: 113%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 103 102 104 104 104 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 105
Write 106
Mixed 58.3
SusWrite 102
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
115% Outstanding
MC Read 48.9
MC Write 44.1
MC Mixed 42.9
129% 45.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 60.9
66% 60.9 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 115%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 144 27" 1280 720 MSI1462 Optix MAG27CQ
Typical SABERTOOTH X79 Builds (Compare 1,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X79 - $335

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $812
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback