Lenovo 21FE001SUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive251% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 21FE001SUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21FE001SUS
Memory14.4 GB free of 32 GB
Display3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230905
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJan 04 '24 at 23:51
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 63.5
1-Core 89.2
2-Core 169
60% 107 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 562
52% 434 Pts
64-Core 788
49% 788 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 231D) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.40.05.08
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
18% Very poor
Lighting 20.3
Reflection 16.9
Parallax 32.7
16% 23.3 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 25
Splatting 35.2
21% 23.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18%
Great: 50%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SKHynix_HFS001TEJ9X162N 1TB
734GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51730A10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 776 1003 983 1605 1562 1693 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
251% Outstanding
Read 2481
Write 1,532
Mixed 1,703
SusWrite 1,270
390% 1,747 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 55.3
182% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 584
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 587
379% 450 MB/s
Poor: 191%
This bench: 251%
Great: 526%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78AGBSA092N 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
129% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 55.9
MC Mixed 52.5
139% 48.5 GB/s
SC Read 34
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 43
105% 36.7 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 114%
This bench: 129%
Great: 179%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 58 60 16" 1280 720 LEN41BD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback