Asus P8Z77-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-M  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130910
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateDec 28 '23 at 11:53
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 93
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 193
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 315
8-Core 462
48% 389 Pts
64-Core 467
29% 467 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
MSI(1462 2872) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.44
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
20.3% Poor
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 26.9
Parallax 31.7
19% 27.1 fps
MRender 33.3
Gravity 29.4
Splatting 25.1
24% 29.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 525ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 73 72 74 71 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 137
Write 84.2
Mixed 88.1
SusWrite 72.7
21% 95.6 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 27.6
103% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 97.6
DQ Write 98.3
DQ Mixed 85.4
68% 93.8 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 73%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
740GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 119 140 141 142 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 141
Write 130
Mixed 82
SusWrite 137
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
414GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 90 95 97 97 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 51.4
Write 96
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 95.1
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 90%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$60
341GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 87 99 99 100 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 85.5
Write 81.5
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 97
60% 81.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
372GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 136 156 162 159 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 152
Write 154
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 156
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
76% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 106%
ST4000DM 000-2AE166 4TB
97GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 2.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 50.2
Write 40
Mixed 33
SusWrite 1.7
38% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
92% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 53%
ST4000DM 000-2AE166 4TB
40GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 31 36 36 36 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 39.6
Write 41.3
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 35.2
51% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
88% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 53%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
80GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 2.4 1.6 1.5 1.1 1.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
7.75% Terrible
Read 29.2
Write 29.8
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 1.6
29% 22.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
54% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.75%
Great: 53%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
14GB free, PID 0551
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 2.6 1.6 1.5 1.5 1.6 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 33.9
Write 35.8
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 1.7
34% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.5
111% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD34G13332 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.8% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 16.4
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 63.2
63% 63.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 0P 2R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 8% 40 218 60 60 31.5" 1280 720 MEIA0C9 Panasonic-TV
Typical P8Z77-M Builds (Compare 1,296 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $442
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback