PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | ECS X77H2-A3 (all builds) |
Memory | 10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130104 |
Uptime | 12 Days |
Run Date | Dec 25 '23 at 23:44 |
Run Duration | 175 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 47% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
61.3%
Good
|
58% 93.6 Pts
|
32% 239 Pts
|
15% 246 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.3
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
51.7%
Above average
|
54% 72.6 fps
|
48% 60.1 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 80 84 81 78 77 MB/s
|
34.9%
Below average
|
26% 118 MB/s
|
69% 23.5 MB/s
|
33% 48 MB/s
|
![]() Hitachi HTS725032A9A364 320GB-$55
16GB free
Firmware: PC3ZC70F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 55 60 62 61 57 MB/s
|
36%
Below average
|
38% 52.2 MB/s
|
112% 0.77 MB/s
|
|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 178 181 192 194 197 MB/s
|
92.6%
Outstanding
|
98% 135 MB/s
|
104% 0.87 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD WD6400AACS-00G8B1 640GB
138GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 84 81 83 85 84 MB/s
|
39.3%
Below average
|
41% 56 MB/s
|
136% 1.03 MB/s
|
|
![]() Maxtor OneTouch II 251GB
160GB free, PID 7100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 25 25 25 MB/s
|
13.2%
Very poor
|
35% 29.5 MB/s
|
27% 0.8 MB/s
|
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 55 | 26 | 60 | 31.6" | 1280 720 | ACR0507 EB321HQU C |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i3-3240IntelBench 55%, 37,789 samples | 4x |
Xeon E31235IntelBench 70%, 223 samples | 3x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 2x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
HD Graphics P3000IntelBench 2%, 729 samples | 2x |
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 2x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 4x |
SM841N 2.5 7mm 128GBSamsungBench 79%, 1,759 samples | 1x |
Extreme 120GBSanDisk $160Bench 69%, 11,787 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $159 |