ECS X77H2-A3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardECS X77H2-A3  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130104
Uptime12 Days
Run DateDec 25 '23 at 23:44
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 47%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400S-$70
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
61.3% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 69.3
2-Core 129
58% 93.6 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 248
32% 239 Pts
64-Core 246
15% 246 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.11.3
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.7% Above average
Lighting 65.8
Reflection 62.3
Parallax 89.6
54% 72.6 fps
MRender 62
Gravity 71.3
Splatting 47.1
48% 60.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 80 84 81 78 77 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.9% Below average
Read 146
Write 115
Mixed 129
SusWrite 81.6
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 33.2
4K Mixed 21.2
69% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 30
DQ Write 77.8
DQ Mixed 36.3
33% 48 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 81%
Hitachi HTS725032A9A364 320GB-$55
16GB free
Firmware: PC3ZC70F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 55 60 62 61 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 66.2
Write 45.8
Mixed 37.5
SusWrite 59.2
38% 52.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 36%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 178 181 192 194 197 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 137
Write 144
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 186
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 92.6%
Great: 106%
WD WD6400AACS-00G8B1 640GB
138GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 84 81 83 85 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 53.9
Write 47.6
Mixed 39.9
SusWrite 82.8
41% 56 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 49%
Maxtor OneTouch II 251GB
160GB free, PID 7100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 24 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 51.4
Write 21.7
Mixed 20.4
SusWrite 24.6
35% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.6
27% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5030EF68F9W1600 859B BLS4G3D169DS3.16FE 0443 RMR5030EF68F9W1600 859B BLS4G3D169DS3.16FE 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.6% Average
MC Read 16
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 13.9
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 79.6
50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 26 60 31.6" 1280 720 ACR0507 EB321HQU C
Typical X77H2-A3 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: ECS X77H2-A3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $159
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback