Today's hottest deals

LG 16Z90R-G.AA76G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics13.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive441% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLG 16Z90R-G.AA76G  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 16Z90R
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '23 at 14:28
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1360P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 59.1
1-Core 199
2-Core 374
107% 210 Pts
4-Core 626
8-Core 892
95% 759 Pts
64-Core 1,221
76% 1,221 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(1854 0488) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3688
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 26.6
Parallax 24.7
17% 24.2 fps
MRender 23.2
Gravity 1
Splatting 1
6% 8.4 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS512GEJ9X101N 512GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51000A20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3481 2368 739 742 755 741 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
441% Outstanding
Read 4,598
Write 3,835
Mixed 2,579
SusWrite 1471
695% 3,121 MB/s
4K Read 78.4
4K Write 229
4K Mixed 112
383% 140 MB/s
DQ Read 1,379
DQ Write 783
DQ Mixed 1,148
836% 1,103 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 441%
Great: 441%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB0BM-MGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
156% Outstanding
MC Read 59.3
MC Write 66.6
MC Mixed 58.8
176% 61.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 49.7
SC Mixed 25.5
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 156%
Great: 149%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 16" 1280 720 LGD06EB
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback