HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory5.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130506
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJan 06 '18 at 15:01
Run Duration276 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 205
75% 132 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 517
54% 436 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
EVGA(3842 2732) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.45% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 5.04
Parallax 3.34
4% 4.23 fps
MRender 5.48
Gravity 4.23
Splatting 3.09
3% 4.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.45%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721010KLA330 1TB-$47
790GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GKAOA9DA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 76.6
Write 77.4
Mixed 82.1
60% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.42
109% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 46%
58GB free, PID fafa
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
5.82% Terrible
Read 22
Write 5.94
Mixed 6.28
11% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 4.34
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.09
23% 1.51 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.82%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 04CB Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.6% Average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.5
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback