Acer Predator PO3-600

Performance Results


Gaming 135% UFO	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 124% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago, 4 months ago.

System	Acer Predator PO3-600 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Predator PO3-600(DCH)
Memory	19.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20200408
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 18 '23 at 23:06
Run Duration	133 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700-$250 79,875 User benchmarks, average bench 92% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	Memory 87.1 1-Core 132 2-Core 271 90% 163 Pts	4-Core 519 8-Core 919 87% 719 Pts	64-Core 938 58% 938 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 99%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385 17,450 User benchmarks, average bench 145% Asus(1043 88F8) CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.33 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	150% Outstanding	Lighting 205 Reflection 192 Parallax 210 167% 203 fps	MRender 295 Gravity 166 Splatting 124 151% 195 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 150% Great: 156%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GB 18,999 User benchmarks, average bench 168% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: 20110000 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 873 Write 1,066 Mixed 951 216% 963 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 98 4K Mixed 45.5 152% 57 MB/s	DQ Read 1023 DQ Write 773 DQ Mixed 876 661% 891 MB/s
Poor: 110% Great: 213%
Micron CT2000X 2TB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 50GB free Firmware: PMAP SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 315 365 397 397 92 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	65.7% Good	Read 315 Write 325 Mixed 314 SusWrite 294 70% 312 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 55.9 4K Mixed 24.7 91% 33.3 MB/s	DQ Read 152 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 147 115% 157 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD Samsung M378A1K43DB2-CTD 32GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	67.9% Good	MC Read 24.3 MC Write 26.1 MC Mixed 21 68% 23.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 26.7 SC Mixed 21.4 60% 21 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 67.9% Great: 76%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	55	165	27"	1280 720	ACR074A XB273U

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator PO3-600 Builds (Compare 2,627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 78%

Battleship

System: Acer Predator PO3-600

CPU
Core i7-9700Intel $250Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	896x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	698x
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	579x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	486x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	440x
GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples	392x

SSD
PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G-1014 512GBWDCBench 168%, 18,999 samples	512x
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ1 256GBKingstonBench 100%, 13,793 samples	323x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	167x

RAM
M378A1K43DB2-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 79%, 6,043 samples	495x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 80%, 9,970 samples	312x
ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 78%, 1,446 samples	197x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $574

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16