Dell XPS 8500

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	5.14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	66.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dell XPS 8500 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0NW73C
Memory	19.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180308
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 15 '23 at 01:26
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	67% Good	Memory 78 1-Core 97.2 2-Core 186 69% 120 Pts	4-Core 313 8-Core 386 45% 349 Pts	64-Core 369 23% 369 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 67% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7570 12,360 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Dell(1028 2B22) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	5.14% Terrible	Lighting 6.5 Reflection 7.1 Parallax 5.7 5% 6.43 fps	MRender 6.8 Gravity 5.2 Splatting 5.8 5% 5.93 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.14% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 75GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 219 47 32 29 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	66.5% Good	Read 402 Write 400 Mixed 267 SusWrite 125 67% 298 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 55.1 4K Mixed 32.9 112% 38.4 MB/s	DQ Read 257 DQ Write 96.1 DQ Mixed 119 103% 157 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 123%
Samsung 750 EVO 500GB 31,052 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 465GB free Firmware: MAT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 224 223 212 210 211 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	66.5% Good	Read 236 Write 221 Mixed 195 SusWrite 215 49% 217 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 50.6 4K Mixed 35 112% 37.5 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 191 DQ Mixed 196 147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 123%
Samsung 845DC EVO 960GB 97 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 455GB free Firmware: EXT03X3Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 225 223 215 212 213 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	61.3% Good	Read 229 Write 229 Mixed 190 SusWrite 216 49% 216 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 48.2 4K Mixed 28.9 96% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 198 148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 109%
SABRENT 500GB 1,200 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 423GB free Firmware: 0204 SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 29 30 29 29 30 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	25.3% Poor	Read 58.2 Write 23.5 Mixed 26.8 SusWrite 29.2 25% 34.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.1 234% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 63%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$68 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 708GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 52 53 49 52 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	47.2% Average	Read 113 Write 99.8 Mixed 79.3 SusWrite 51.5 64% 85.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 47.2% Great: 67%
ioSafe SoloPROv2 3TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 10GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 27 28 27 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 54.6 Write 25.4 Mixed 26.6 SusWrite 27.1 41% 33.4 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.7 52% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 859B CT102464BD160B.M16 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 24GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	51.2% Above average	MC Read 19 MC Write 18.4 MC Mixed 16 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 15.9 SC Mixed 17.1 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 87.9 46% 87.9 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	50	18	60	27"	1280 720	ACI27A1 VS278

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical XPS 8500 Builds (Compare 2,104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8500

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,670x
Core i5-3450Intel $59Bench 66%, 34,199 samples	144x
Core i5-3350PIntel $60Bench 65%, 21,413 samples	139x

GPU
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	162x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	155x
GeForce GT 620NvidiaBench 2%, 17,163 samples	112x

SSD
PM830 mSATA 256GBSamsungBench 63%, 9,379 samples	58x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	57x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	55x

RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples	156x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	80x
NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 4x4GBNanyaBench 58%, 1,608 samples	77x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $297

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16