Today's hottest deals

HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 Mobile Workstation PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.96% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ZBook Fury 16 G10 Mobile Workstation PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B92
Memory18.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '23 at 14:46
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13950HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 54.9
1-Core 152
2-Core 255
82% 154 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 672
67% 547 Pts
64-Core 1,211
75% 1,211 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 121%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
HP(103C 8B92) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4887
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
5.96% Terrible
Lighting 6.5
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 7.7
5% 8.17 fps
MRender 9.1
Gravity 10.1
Splatting 7.8
7% 9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.96%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg80znv512g KIOXIA 512GB
244GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP01AP40
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,621
Write 1,355
Mixed 1,206
310% 1,394 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 68.9
4K Mixed 52.5
169% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 444
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 360
255% 330 MB/s
Poor: 120% Great: 361%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$149
1.5TB free
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 954
Write 1,011
Mixed 879
212% 948 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 40.2
134% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 474
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 340
244% 324 MB/s
Poor: 286% Great: 587%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R2GA3BB0-CQKOD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
104% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 43.3
MC Mixed 41.7
116% 40.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 22.2
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 104%
This bench: 104%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 44 15 120 16" 1280 720 AUO87A8
Typical ZBook Fury 16 G10 Mobile Workstation PC Builds (Compare 92 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

System: HP ZBook Fury 16 G10 Mobile Workstation PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback