Acer Aspire E5-573G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 26%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-573G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer ZORO_BH
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150925
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '23 at 02:10
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-5005U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Memory 24.7
1-Core 38.7
2-Core 78.6
26% 47.3 Pts
4-Core 119
8-Core 133
16% 126 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)
Acer(1025 098A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
3.19% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 2
Parallax 5.6
3% 3.77 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 4.1
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.19%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 1TB 1TB
908GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8442c31
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 221 246 172 73 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 355
Write 259
Mixed 254
SusWrite 180
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 27.6
4K Mixed 17.8
55% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 154
112% 143 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 233%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Atermiter H0-CK0 Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/8G 12GB
0, 0 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.4% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.2
MC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.83 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 7.6
SC Mixed 7.9
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 197
20% 197 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 32 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 LGD0456
Typical Aspire E5-573G Builds (Compare 1,230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-573G - $680

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $708
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback