Acer Predator PHN16-71

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 118%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics146% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PHN16-71  (all builds)
MotherboardRPL Compass_RTX
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230907
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 14:08
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900HX
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Memory 81.8
1-Core 216
2-Core 425
124% 241 Pts
4-Core 826
8-Core 1,508
140% 1,167 Pts
64-Core 3,385
210% 3,385 Pts
Poor: 108%
This bench: 118%
Great: 120%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070 (Laptop)
Acer(1025 170F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 529.01
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
146% Outstanding
Lighting 199
Reflection 181
Parallax 202
162% 194 fps
MRender 287
Gravity 170
Splatting 120
149% 192 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 146%
Great: 152%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Micron_3400_MTFDKBA1T0TFH 1TB
893GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P7MA000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,047
Write 4,302
Mixed 2,760
826% 3,703 MB/s
4K Read 67.7
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 97.9
318% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,581
DQ Write 1,224
DQ Mixed 1,343
1,021% 1,383 MB/s
Poor: 196% Great: 540%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78AGBSA095N 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
96% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 34.6
102% 35.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 33.4
SC Mixed 22.7
70% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 76.6
52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 96%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 165 16" 1280 720 AUOCDAB
Typical Predator PHN16-71 Builds (Compare 1,462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 122%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PHN16-71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback