Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
11 months ago, 11 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H370M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory58.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 01 '23 at 20:50
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$135
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 125
2-Core 246
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 473
8-Core 777
76% 625 Pts
64-Core 987
61% 987 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
ASRock(1849 5210) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 133
Parallax 291
108% 185 fps
MRender 237
Gravity 144
Splatting 199
158% 193 fps
Poor: 117%
This bench: 120%
Great: 128%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO 2TB
791GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 419 426 434 431 436 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 472
Write 413
Mixed 403
SusWrite 426
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 48.9
4K Mixed 42.2
139% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 258
193% 263 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 126%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB
3TB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 419 425 433 431 434 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 432
Mixed 423
SusWrite 426
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 45.1
4K Mixed 40.2
135% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 218
169% 239 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905701-022.A00G 99U5734-036.A00G 9905701-022.A00G 99U5734-036.A00G 64GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.7% Excellent
MC Read 31.7
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 27.5
88% 31 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 28.1
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 66.9
60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 24" 1280 720 ONN0101 ONA24HB19T01
Typical PRIME H370M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $71
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback