Today's hottest deals

MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics0.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive366% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory76GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 76GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory69 GB free of 76 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '23 at 15:31
Run Duration473 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$358
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Memory 72.7
1-Core 170
2-Core 342
102% 195 Pts
4-Core 655
8-Core 1,193
111% 924 Pts
64-Core 2,555
158% 2,555 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Gigabyte(1458 3629) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.81
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.73% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1
Parallax 0.5
1% 0.8 fps
MRender 1.7
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.7
1% 0.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.73%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
703GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2692 2748 2758 2558 1580 1507 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
366% Outstanding
Read 2,621
Write 3,007
Mixed 2,825
SusWrite 2307
608% 2,690 MB/s
4K Read 62.5
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 79.3
254% 83.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,041
DQ Write 823
DQ Mixed 947
704% 937 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 366%
Great: 477%
St14000n M001G-2KJ103 14TB
747GB free
Firmware: SN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 25 25 26 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.6% Very poor
Read 126
Write 111
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 25.4
18% 82.3 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 11.8
4K Mixed 1.2
43% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 4.4
DQ Write 15.9
DQ Mixed 2.5
4% 7.6 MB/s
St14000n M0018-2H4101 14TB
1TB free
Firmware: SN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 25 26 26 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Read 129
Write 116
Mixed 72
SusWrite 26
19% 85.6 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 12.5
4K Mixed 1.4
43% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 2.5
DQ Write 9.2
DQ Mixed 1.6
2% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 39%
St20000n M007D-3DJ103 20TB
3TB free
Firmware: SN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 24 25 25 26 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Read 129
Write 110
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 24.6
18% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 16.7
4K Mixed 1
44% 13.3 MB/s
DQ Read 4
DQ Write 12.7
DQ Mixed 0.6
3% 5.77 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 47%
St14000n M000J-2TX103 14TB
6TB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 108 107 112 106 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25.4% Poor
Read 125
Write 114
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 107
24% 106 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 17
4K Mixed 0.9
50% 14.8 MB/s
DQ Read 4.1
DQ Write 13.8
DQ Mixed 0.3
3% 6.07 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 37%
Sabrent Rocket 4.0 Plus 1TB
818GB free
Firmware: R4PB47.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3295 3183 3405 917 116 116 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
323% Outstanding
Read 2,037
Write 3,932
Mixed 2,608
SusWrite 1,839
592% 2,604 MB/s
4K Read 53.3
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 78.4
245% 84.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,303
DQ Write 1,035
DQ Mixed 1,150
866% 1,162 MB/s
Poor: 194%
This bench: 323%
Great: 484%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
584GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 60 54 53 30 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 86.2
Write 81
Mixed 49
SusWrite 50.5
49% 66.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 51%
Seagate ST14000NE0008-2JK101 14TB
271GB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 200 202 202 202 202 202 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 83%
Toshiba MQ01ABB200 2TB
982GB free
Firmware: AY00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 92 92 89 92 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Read 104
Write 84
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 89.9
54% 75.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 61%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$110
361GB free
Firmware: RT17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 34 34 34 36 34 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 96
Write 80.8
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 34.6
44% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 0.7
266% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
853GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 163 160 157 168 165 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 65.2
Write 97.8
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 162
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.5
200% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB
571GB free
Firmware: CC96
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 85 86 82 87 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 88.2
Write 88.2
Mixed 30
SusWrite 83.6
53% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
101% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 74%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
409GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 122 117 123 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 73
Write 104
Mixed 72
SusWrite 119
68% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.6
213% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 137 143 136 143 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 86.8
Write 113
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 141
73% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.6
217% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS4G4D240FSB.8FBD CL16-20-20 D4-3200 BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD CL16-20-20 D4-3200 75GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 32767, 8192, 32767 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
102% Outstanding
MC Read 66
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 26.5
114% 39.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.9
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 25.6
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 15 4 60 15.9" 1280 720 DZX1580 Z1
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,790 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $914
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $365
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback