Today's hottest deals

Toshiba Satellite S55-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemToshiba Satellite S55-A  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel VG10F
Memory10.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 03 '18 at 00:56
Run Duration93 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3337U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
54.2% Above average
Memory 78.3
1-Core 64.9
2-Core 131
56% 91.3 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 175
24% 176 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 FA45) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4653
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.63% Terrible
Lighting 3.97
Reflection 8.08
Parallax 2.78
3% 4.94 fps
MRender 5.24
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.7
4% 5.06 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$70
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 460
Write 259
Mixed 263
72% 328 MB/s
4K Read 8.54
4K Write 19.5
4K Mixed 5.45
30% 11.1 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 83.5
DQ Mixed 26.8
44% 87.8 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 17.8
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 16.6
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Satellite S55-A Builds (Compare 142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite S55-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback