Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 123%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 124%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 126%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics82.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive338% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221005
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 25 '23 at 17:13
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X-$368
AM5, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 5.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Memory 90.4
1-Core 218
2-Core 430
128% 246 Pts
4-Core 857
8-Core 1,669
150% 1,263 Pts
64-Core 2,844
176% 2,844 Pts
Poor: 97%
This bench: 126%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64-$400
CLim: 1630 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.7% Excellent
Lighting 104
Reflection 114
Parallax 177
85% 132 fps
MRender 92.4
Gravity 124
Splatting 77.2
78% 97.9 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2137 623 618 622 623 621 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
338% Outstanding
Read 2,565
Write 2,401
Mixed 1,706
SusWrite 874
422% 1,887 MB/s
4K Read 72.7
4K Write 212
4K Mixed 102
353% 129 MB/s
DQ Read 1,819
DQ Write 1,459
DQ Mixed 1,584
1,201% 1,621 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 338%
Great: 340%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$100
709GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 498 498 499 498 499 499 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 522
Write 499
Mixed 435
SusWrite 498
110% 489 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 54.8
198% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 371
279% 372 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 129%
Great: 121%
XPG GAMMIX S70 BLADE 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 3.2.F.83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5217 5197 5231 5222 5237 5219 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
625% Outstanding
Read 2,688
Write 5,351
Mixed 2,968
SusWrite 5,221
924% 4,057 MB/s
4K Read 69.2
4K Write 280
4K Mixed 98.4
379% 149 MB/s
DQ Read 2,079
DQ Write 1,665
DQ Mixed 1,853
1,392% 1,866 MB/s
Poor: 256%
This bench: 625%
Great: 625%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH32GX5M2B5600Z36 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
182% Outstanding
MC Read 74.2
MC Write 60.8
MC Mixed 63.9
189% 66.3 GB/s
SC Read 55.4
SC Write 63.2
SC Mixed 59.5
170% 59.4 GB/s
Latency 65.7
61% 65.7 ns
Poor: 133%
This bench: 182%
Great: 198%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 63: 0P 5R 10G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
56% 19% 105 517 412 240 27" 1920 1009 LEN66AA Y25-25
History: Score 56: 0P 4R 10G 6B | Score 63: 0P 5R 10G 8B
Typical ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 136 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 412%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 420%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X670E-A GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $2,453
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback