Si P67A-C43

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSi P67A-C43  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI P67A-C43 (MS-7673)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 02 '18 at 19:42
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
75.6% Very good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 94.1
2-Core 182
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 346
8-Core 350
46% 348 Pts
64-Core 351
22% 351 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450
MSI(1462 2340) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.12% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 1.73
Parallax 1.59
1% 1.56 fps
MRender 1.67
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.57
1% 1.36 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.12%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 750GB (2009)-$60
593GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
41.1% Average
Read 71.9
Write 71.6
Mixed 65.2
52% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.13
4K Write 0.42
4K Mixed 0.14
29% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 58%
FANTOM WD10EACS-00D6B1 1TB
460GB free, PID 1340
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
14.9% Very poor
Read 28.2
Write 23.7
Mixed 25
32% 25.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.3
73% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 11
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67A-C43 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Si P67A-C43

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback