Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 15-fc0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop 15-fc0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8B2F
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230428
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateNov 22 '23 at 16:47
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Silver 7120U Graphics
FT6, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Memory 54.5
1-Core 79.6
2-Core 124
50% 85.9 Pts
4-Core 131
8-Core 121
17% 126 Pts
64-Core 122
8% 122 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
HP(103C 8B2F) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.42.18
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
3.06% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 10.8
2% 8.03 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 5.2
5% 6.53 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.06%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZH 512GB
402GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 321 385 307 381 438 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 314
Write 297
Mixed 263
SusWrite 364
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 21.6
4K Mixed 23.5
71% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 189
134% 170 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 273%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB0BM-MGCP 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB 23h clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.3% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 13.3
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 13
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 10 144 48 60 15.5" 1536 793 CMN1538
Typical Laptop 15-fc0xxx Builds (Compare 137 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15-fc0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback