Lenovo 81LK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive159% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemLenovo 81LK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220524
Uptime13.9 Days
Run DateNov 16 '23 at 05:28
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300HF
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 93.7
1-Core 116
2-Core 215
82% 142 Pts
4-Core 283
8-Core 453
45% 368 Pts
64-Core 526
33% 526 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 3A41) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.3% Average
Lighting 55.9
Reflection 62.4
Parallax 50.9
46% 56.4 fps
MRender 41.2
Gravity 50.9
Splatting 49.1
39% 47.1 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPMPZ-512G-1101 512GB
332GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21110001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 756 422 404 432 433 432 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
159% Outstanding
Read 1,075
Write 1,521
Mixed 1,011
SusWrite 480
230% 1,022 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 53.7
183% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 854
DQ Write 498
DQ Mixed 684
507% 679 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 159%
Great: 215%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
436GB free
Firmware: M6CR056
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 359 354 393 407 404 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 343
Write 336
Mixed 388
SusWrite 360
81% 357 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 15.9
73% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 29.8
66% 130 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 100%
WD Elements 2667 4TB
2TB free, PID 2667
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 44 44 44 48 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 21.3
Write 39.7
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 45.6
47% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.3
93% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 64%
ASMedia AS2115 320GB
168GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 18 17 17 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
10.8% Very poor
Read 49.8
Write 7
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 16.4
19% 19.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.8%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF2666C16S4/16G 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
38.4% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 10.7
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 10.9
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 61.2
65% 61.2 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN15E7
Typical 81LK Builds (Compare 6,307 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 81LK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback