Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GT
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210208
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 15 '23 at 23:25
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
64.8% Good
Memory 71.7
1-Core 100
2-Core 162
65% 111 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 517
51% 415 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 1AB1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1631
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.1% Terrible
Lighting 6.6
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 8.1
5% 7.83 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 10.6
8% 9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.1%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
116GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 12 72 145 59 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 1,119
Write 870
Mixed 712
SusWrite 100
156% 700 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 80.1
4K Mixed 50
164% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 336
DQ Write 520
DQ Mixed 220
225% 358 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 121%
Great: 209%
WDC WD60 02FRYZ-01WD5B0 6TB
918GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.2% Poor
Read 96.8
Write 96.1
Mixed 53.1
SusWrite 15.9
82% 65.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 84%
HUS72606 0ALA640 6TB
419GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.3% Poor
Read 125
Write 34
Mixed 42.1
SusWrite 15.9
58% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
41% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.3% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 22.5
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 27.8
SC Mixed 21.7
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 0 15.5" 1280 720 NCP002D
Typical TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT Builds (Compare 2,165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback