Today's hottest deals

Packard EasyNote TM85

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemPackard EasyNote TM85  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard EasyNote TM85
Memory4.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100422
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 13 '16 at 00:06
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3 M 330
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Memory 30.3
1-Core 19.5
2-Core 33.6
18% 27.8 Pts
4-Core 39.7
8-Core 47.4
6% 43.6 Pts
64-Core 45.3
3% 45.3 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320M
Acer(1025 036D) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4192
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.43% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 2.31
Parallax 0.59
1% 1.42 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 0.97
Splatting 2.52
2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.43%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 603ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Read 247
Write 125
Mixed 168
40% 180 MB/s
4K Read 16.8
4K Write 26.6
4K Mixed 13.5
57% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 49
DQ Write 45.2
DQ Mixed 19.9
22% 38 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 73%
WD 2500BEV External 250GB
90GB free, PID 0702
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 25.8
Write 23.1
Mixed 24.4
31% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.35
4K Write 1.33
4K Mixed 0.31
57% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 20%
SDHC Card 8GB
7GB free, PID null
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 21.9
Write 11.7
Mixed 13.8
18% 15.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 1.46
4K Mixed 1.13
100% 1.96 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 11%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 ACR256X64D3S1333C9 6GB
1067, 1067 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
9.64% Terrible
MC Read 3.2
MC Write 3.1
MC Mixed 4.1
10% 3.47 GB/s
SC Read 1
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 1.5
4% 1.37 GB/s
Latency 253
16% 253 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 9.64%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TM85 Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TM85

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback