Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 21JT001FAU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.04% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive93.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 21JT001FAU  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 21JT001FAU
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230926
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateNov 14 '23 at 20:21
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7530U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
34.7% Below average
Memory 31.8
1-Core 57.5
2-Core 114
36% 67.7 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 384
35% 293 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 50D5) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.20.44.50
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6.04% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 10.9
5% 9.5 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 9.2
Splatting 11.5
8% 10.1 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.04%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN740 SDDQMQD-512G-1201 512GB
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 73116101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 494 510 557 634 678 675 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 594
Write 468
Mixed 491
SusWrite 591
121% 536 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 23.9
4K Mixed 22.5
72% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 406
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 287
203% 266 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 482%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
59.1% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 22.5
62% 21.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 21.3
SC Mixed 20
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 249
16% 249 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 55 60 16" 1280 720 LEN41B5
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback