Lenovo 3259CTO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 3259CTO  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3259CTO
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120725
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 31 '17 at 20:00
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3360M-$594
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 75.4
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 154
64% 108 Pts
4-Core 214
8-Core 222
29% 218 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5001) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.92% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 4.92
Parallax 3.03
4% 4.08 fps
MRender 5.52
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.35
5% 5.45 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.92%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 397
Mixed 409
97% 438 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 32.6
125% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 79.5
83% 137 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 124%
WD 1200BEVExternal 120GB
9GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Read 25.8
Write 23.7
Mixed 23.6
31% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.22
59% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 19%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB
4GB free, PID a81d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
7.08% Terrible
Read 29.1
Write 6.55
Mixed 7.77
14% 14.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.95
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
23% 1.99 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 7.08%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NT4GC64B8HG0NS-DI Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 18
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 16.3
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 17.5
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 89.5
45% 89.5 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3259CTO Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3259CTO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $165
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback